| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IFA_MAX sets wrong in rtnetlink.h |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 May 2004 13:48:02 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040526135610.2ecaa96a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <200405261319.55787.mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx> <200405261350.39088.mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040526135610.2ecaa96a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20040526135610.2ecaa96a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 26 May 2004
13:56:10 -0700), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:50:39 -0700
> Shirley Ma <mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > A tiny patch here for 2.6.6 kernel.
>
> Good catch, patch applied.
BTW, how do you think of the code below to minimize diffs and risk of error
when we add new item for enum?
enum {
:
IFA_MULTICAST,
__IFA_MAX
};
#define IFA_MAX (__IFA_MAX - 1)
-----
enum {
:
IFA_CACHEINFO
};
#define IFA_MAX IFA_CACHEINFO
enum {
:
IFA_CACHEINFO, /* changed to add "," */
IFA_MULTICAST /* added */
};
#define IFA_MAX IFA_MULTICAST /* changed */
--- vs ---
enum {
:
IFA_CACHEINFO,
__IFA_MAX
};
#define IFA_MAX (__IFA_MAX - 1)
enum {
:
IFA_CACHEINFO,
IFA_MULTICAST, /* added */
__IFA_MAX
};
#define IFA_MAX (__IFA_MAX - 1)
--yoshfuji
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | abysmal e1000 performance (DITR), Thayne Harbaugh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IFA_MAX sets wrong in rtnetlink.h, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IFA_MAX sets wrong in rtnetlink.h, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IFA_MAX sets wrong in rtnetlink.h, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |