| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:98 -- compiling with distcc |
| From: | Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:15:21 +0200 |
| Cc: | marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx, jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx, carson@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040429162632.689fa7fe.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <382320000.1082759593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16527.4259.174536.629347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040429210951.GB20453@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040429142807.1fa4c5ea.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20040429224936.GT29954@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040429162632.689fa7fe.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 04:26:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > The only application which we know will exercise that code is the distcc > server. Making that little change while testing the patch will increase > the chance of shaking out any problems. if you're scared it has bugs I think it'd be more useful to change it to "|| 1" and run it under some stress test, and then remove the "|| 1". the aio code in unmap_kvec is also a big user of that. a schedule every 40M of ram freed isn't too nice to my eyes (but I doubt it can be measured). |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Fw: Stack sends SYN/ACKs even though accept queue is full, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: HELP ipt_hook: happy cracking message, panemade |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:98 -- compiling with distcc, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |