| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] tulip, kernel 2.4.26-rc2, 3rd try |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 11 Apr 2004 15:37:15 -0400 |
| Cc: | Timothy I Mattox <tmattox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, tulip-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Jay Estabrook <Jay.Estabrook@xxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <40770EA3.6040102@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.43.0404091631060.19041-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40770EA3.6040102@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 16:59, Jeff Garzik wrote: > It's not ready to turn them all on yet, unfortunately. Tulip driver > desperately wants ethtool support, too. > > Dr. Jamal Salim ported the phy code from a recent version of Donald > Becker's tulip.c to upstream... that's what we really want to merge. > Jay Estabrook updated this while pursuing tulip problems on alpha. This > patch needs testing and merging... > The code Jeff mentions is about a year old - so needs updates. I will send anyone who will ensure that this goes in cleanly one or two of my NICs + the code since i dont have much time to allocate to this lately. There were bits in there as well to fix SYM phys in addition to the netif_carrier_xxxx stuff. You want the NICs you have to promise to make sure both work. Send me private email. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | sch_dsmark bug, Hugo Santos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sch_dsmark bug, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] tulip, kernel 2.4.26-rc2, 3rd try, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | [patch] 2.6.5-rc2 - r8169 DAC, Francois Romieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |