netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] NETDEBUG network triggerable messages in IPv6

To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NETDEBUG network triggerable messages in IPv6
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:24:38 +0200
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040410.030904.82108741.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040409193123.63e4cdc7.ak@xxxxxxx> <20040410.024705.97089877.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040409195052.10ba931c.ak@xxxxxxx> <20040410.030904.82108741.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 03:09:04 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@ <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <20040409195052.10ba931c.ak@xxxxxxx> (at Fri, 9 Apr 2004 19:50:52 
> +0200), Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> says:
> 
> > >   NETDEBUG_PRINTK_LIMIT("overrun destopt\n"..)
> > > 
> > > (or something like this) much more.
> > 
> > ... and this will make the lines even longer.
> 
> If you mind that, you can use shorter name 
> like IP6DEBUG / IP6DEBUG_LIMIT() etc.

Yes, I opted for NETDEBUG_LIMIT.

-Andi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>