| To: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: fealnx oopses (with [PATCH]) |
| From: | Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:09:37 +0300 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Andreas Henriksson <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20040401002325.A9022@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200403261214.58127.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406B2FB5.9080302@xxxxxxxxx> <20040401002325.A9022@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thursday 01 April 2004 01:23, Francois Romieu wrote: > Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : > > FYI to those involved, I sent the TX patch upstream. > > > > When there is a minimal RX patch people are happy with, let me know... > > further changes are fine, but I would like to split up the changes as > > much as is reasonable. > > Attached is the patch tested by Andreas which fixes single allocation > failures but will not protect against excessive work in irq handler nor > complete depletion of the Rx ring. > > It applies on top of the Tx patch (as seen on bk-commit). > > Earth-shattering, anyone ? Yes, this thing improved life for me (from oopses to uninterruptible excessive work in interrupt). My RX coding was on top of it, so I think this should be applied. Jeff? -- vda |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] pfkey_send_new_mapping(), Michal Ludvig |
|---|---|
| Next by Thread: | Re: fealnx oopses (with [PATCH]), Francois Romieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |