| To: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:40:34 +0200 |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040329193604.A4744@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040329193604.A4744@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:36:04 +0200 Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are a few (hopefully) harmless things in the local queue that I'd > appreciate to go mainline before the second round of r8169 changes. Do you have any plans to convert it to use DAC? I feel a bit uncomfortable with using the IOMMU on x86-64 for gigabit ethernet because it would be very easy to overflow it at these bandwidths. DAC would be much safer. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [patch 4/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | route cache DoS testing and softirqs, Dipankar Sarma |
| Previous by Thread: | [patch 4/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue, Francois Romieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |