netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: fealnx oopses

To: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: fealnx oopses
From: Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:52:01 +0200
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Henriksson <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040328232707.GA17524@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200403261214.58127.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200403282219.56799.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040328232707.GA17524@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Monday 29 March 2004 01:27, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 10:19:56PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > I tested on 2.4.25, patch applied with minimal manual correction
> > in last hunk (rediffed patch attached).
>
> I tested on 2.6.5-rc2-bk7 ... with both jeffs (which was exactly the
> same patch I had except for removing the return at the end of the void
> function) and francis patches...
>
> Btw. I haven't seen any panics at all because of rx, just tx, and that
> problem seems solved. But I thought testing additional patches that
> is supposed to cure other problems won't hurt me.. ;)

Thank you, you verified that _I_ did not caused it.
(I could, I was a bit tired at the time)

You need to make your box very RAM starved for this.
I boot with mem=16M and load all iptables NAT/conntrack
modules to make network processing more CPU/RAM intensive.
-- 
vda


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>