| To: | Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: fealnx oopses |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Mar 2004 01:30:07 +0100 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Henriksson <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200403270203.18971.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:03:40AM +0200 |
| References: | <200403261214.58127.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200403270014.23088.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040326233514.B26347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200403270203.18971.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] > Not exactly. CPU does not atomically increment memory. > I am saying that x86 CPU can't be interrupted in the middle > of read-modify-write operation, like Yep, that's exactly what I tought was not possible. Complete brain outage. -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: fealnx oopses, Denis Vlasenko |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] [RFT] 2.6.5-rc2 - sis190 update, Francois Romieu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: fealnx oopses, Denis Vlasenko |
| Next by Thread: | Re: fealnx oopses, Denis Vlasenko |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |