| To: | Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: fealnx oopses |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:35:14 +0100 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Henriksson <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200403270014.23088.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:14:42AM +0200 |
| References: | <200403261214.58127.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200403262157.21624.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40648CAF.5010203@xxxxxxxxx> <200403270014.23088.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] > Yes. But on x86 a++ is atomic vs interrupts - it's a single instruction > and interrupts happen on instruction boundaries only. Do you realize that you are saying that the CPU can atomically increment an integer which sits _in memory_ ? Oops :o) -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: fealnx oopses, Denis Vlasenko |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2.4] Update MAINTAINERS with new e100/e100 maintainers, Scott Feldman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: fealnx oopses, Denis Vlasenko |
| Next by Thread: | Re: fealnx oopses, Denis Vlasenko |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |