netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [2.4/2.6] ipvs: improve conn rehashing, other fixes

from [Julian Anastasov] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [2.4/2.6] ipvs: improve conn rehashing, other fixes
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:48:40 +0200 (EET)
Cc: wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040323004006.14b2373e.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040321230703.408d2240.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403230036130.3318-600000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040322183641.68ecb8a3.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403231027420.1157@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040323004006.14b2373e.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
        Hello,

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, David S. Miller wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:34:54 +0200 (EET)
> Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >     It was the old version. Please, apply everything sent from
> > Wensong. The old versions protect only the list which is not needed
> > on edit but the new versions from Wensong ensure that the service is
> > updated safely while there are no other CPUs using the schedulers.
>
> Sorry, wires got crossed.  Julian/Wensong, could you please resend
> that ip_vs_ctl.c locking change under seperate cover then?

        I still keep them, attached.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

Attachment: linux-2.4-ipvs-updsvc.patch
Description: 2.4 - update_service

Attachment: linux-2.6-ipvs-updsvc.patch
Description: 2.6 - update_service

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [2.4/2.6] ipvs: improve conn rehashing, other fixes, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] [RFT] 2.6.4 - epic100 napi, OGAWA Hirofumi
Previous by Thread:  Re: [2.4/2.6] ipvs: improve conn rehashing, other fixes, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: [2.4/2.6] ipvs: improve conn rehashing, other fixes, David S. Miller
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]