| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 4/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy lookup |
| From: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Mar 2004 03:29:45 +0100 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040322020322.GA1187@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040308110331.GA20719@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <404C874D.4000907@xxxxxxxxx> <20040308115858.75cdddca.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <4059CF17.8090907@xxxxxxxxx> <20040321221604.GA32277@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <405E2673.4090808@xxxxxxxxx> <20040322020322.GA1187@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1 |
Herbert Xu wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 12:34:11AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:Is it correct that __xfrm_route_forward will use NULL for the sock parameter to xfrm_lookup even if the packet is from a local socket ?No that would be wrong as socket policies won't be applied correctly. Forget about that idea :) Thanks anyway, it reminded me to check for !(dst->flags & DST_NOXFRM) before xfrm_lookup, I'm going to change this now. Regards Patrick |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 4/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy lookup, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Submission #4 for S2io 10GbE driver, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 4/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy lookup, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 4/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy lookup, Alexander Samad |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |