[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] packet delay scheduler

To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] packet delay scheduler
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:21:12 -0800
Cc: shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1079707927.1032.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040316151058.3cc2fa28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040316174134.2f1da12a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040318120451.1c9ee286@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1079707927.1032.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 19 Mar 2004 09:52:07 -0500
jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The better alternative is to use the tc extension patches i have
> because then you could write little modules which do different things
> and cascade them. 

I agree that this chaining idea of tc actions is the end-all-be-all
way to do this kind of stuff.

But for now we can put Stephen's delay scheduler in the tree, and I
don't see any real problem with that until your tc action changes
are ready for integration.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>