Re: [PATCH] packet delay scheduler

["David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 19 Mar 2004 09:52:07 -0500
jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The better alternative is to use the tc extension patches i have
> because then you could write little modules which do different things
> and cascade them. 

I agree that this chaining idea of tc actions is the end-all-be-all
way to do this kind of stuff.

But for now we can put Stephen's delay scheduler in the tree, and I
don't see any real problem with that until your tc action changes
are ready for integration.