| To: | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <icampbell@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:31:12 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <20040316192247.A7886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:22:47PM +0000 |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <icampbell@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1079369568.19012.100.camel@icampbell-debian> <20040316001141.C29594@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040316192247.A7886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:22:47PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > So how do we solve this problem. Should I just merge this change and > ask you to pull it? I think that's rather impolite though. > > Or should I send a BK cset which removes include/linux/irq.h entirely, > thereby fixing _my_ problem (though it'll break everyone elses build.) 8) What about moving it to asm-generic now? linux/irq.h never was a public API so the stable API in 2.6 thing doesn't count. And it's fix the confusing for real. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h, Linus Torvalds |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | whoops..., David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h, Adrian Bunk |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] tun -- name fix, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |