| To: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch/RFC] networking menus |
| From: | Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:01:13 +0100 |
| Cc: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>, niv@xxxxxxxxxx, benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040314205438.3d7bcd34.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040314163327.53102f46.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> <20040314190724.1af1f11d.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> <20040314205438.3d7bcd34.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.6 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Monday 15 March 2004 05:54, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> Does it make sense to anyone besides me to move protocol-related
> modules like SLIP, PPP, and PLIP from Device Drivers/Network device(s)
> to "Networking support"?
> They feel more like protocols than device drivers to me....
Or just create sth. like:
Stacks
+- IPv6
+- LLC
+- IrDA
+- Bluetooth
Protocols
+- PPP
+- SLIP
+- ...
Routing
+- Multicast
+- Advanced router
Filtering
Devices
Or similiar
Regards
Ingo Oeser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAVt55U56oYWuOrkARAvGBAKCFh9DMVaKSlnj+X0CFuNFYgAc3CwCgv1vs
uet2gOmSQSwXJSo7hjpes2s=
=LfML
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH} ARP auto-sizing for 2.4.24 - 2.4.26-pre3, Tim Gardner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Add C99 initializers to net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c, Art Haas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch/RFC] networking menus, Randy.Dunlap |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h, Ian Campbell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |