[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [update] 2.6.4-rc2 - Realtek 8169 patches

To: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [update] 2.6.4-rc2 - Realtek 8169 patches
From: crochu nicolas <nicolas.crochu@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:40:57 +0100
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040311193937.A14638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040307023748.A7829@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1078822878.2408.8.camel@pinacola> <20040311193937.A14638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Le jeu 11/03/2004 à 19:39, Francois Romieu a écrit :
> crochu nicolas <nicolas.crochu@xxxxxxxx> :
> > If i apply only these patch, everything goes fine
> [...]
> Did you stress the driver, say (rsync), ping -f -s 8, ttcp ?
> --
> Ueimor

I tested with unison, ping -f -s 8
as did a friend with the same hardware.

My kernel : 2.6.3 + patched driver ( except the last 3 patch )
My friend : a stock 2.6.4-mm1 kernel.

everything goes fine.

my friend told me something about the io/schedulers as a source 
of instability .. i'm investigatng.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>