| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] TCP Vegas for 2.6 |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 09 Mar 2004 10:56:52 -0800 |
| Cc: | John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, linux-net <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040309102206.33c1720c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040309180331.GC11604@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.NEB.4.33.0403091307090.5230-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040309102206.33c1720c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 |
Stephen Hemminger wrote: Every case I tested has vegas faster than the default reno. It is especially noticeable over the DSL. The current implementation is not ready to be turned on by default though. Stephen, just a question regarding your testing. (To save me some effort ;-)). What tests did you run, which testcases, and if it wasn't some standard benchmark, will you consider inclusion of those tests into the LTP or equivalent? [Strange words like "leverage" and "synergy" are popping into my head but I'm suppressing them ;)] thanks, Nivedita |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] TCP Vegas for 2.6, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] TCP Vegas for 2.6, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] TCP Vegas for 2.6, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] TCP Vegas for 2.6, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |