[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:42:45 -0800
Cc: ak@xxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040226194900.GA8230@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040223105359.GA91938@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040223.200101.39143636.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040223111659.GB10681@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040223.203843.04073965.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040223102613.33838132.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040225211526.74478066.ak@xxxxxxx> <20040223133233.71eecc99.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040226194900.GA8230@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 26 Feb 2004 20:49:00 +0100
Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't think it should be only sized for big datagrams and other obscure 
> cases.
> Better is a reasonable default to fit at least 64K of data with a standard 
> MTU like ~1.4K. 
> Or may resize it on MTU change, but I'm not sure that's worth the effort. 
> Are you working on this or should I prepare a new patch? 

Let's just leave things how we've changed them, and when people complain
about jumbo MTU ipv6 icmp messages we'll address it.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>