| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept() |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:12:25 -0800 |
| Cc: | kashyapv@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040225092116.2081ddfb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402250818060.2878-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040225092116.2081ddfb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:21:16 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just a cursory question, but would it be possible to just use iptables > to classify the packets and assign them to different IP addresses. > The the application could manage the priorities by opening two different > sockets (bound to different IP addresses) and do the scheduling there? That's how I would attempt to implement this. I really don't like this idea of putting a pseudo-classifier in the accept queue logic, and an ugly GLOBAL one at that, if anything it ought to be per-socket but even that I don't like. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), kashyapv |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), kashyapv |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |