Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept()

netdev

Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept()

To:	Vivek Kashyap <kashyapv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept()
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:21:16 -0800
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0402250818060.2878-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:	Open Source Development Lab
References:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0402250818060.2878-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

Just a cursory question, but would it be possible to just use iptables
to classify the packets and assign them to different IP addresses.
The the application could manage the priorities by opening two different
sockets (bound to different IP addresses) and do the scheduling there?

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] proportional share accept(), Vivek Kashyap Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), Stephen Hemminger <= Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), kashyapv Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), kashyapv Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), Ronghua Zhang Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), David S. Miller Message not available Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), kashyapv Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), James Morris

Previous by Date:	RE: Update FarSync WAN driver in 2.6, Kevin Curtis
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] proportional share accept(), Vivek Kashyap
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), David S. Miller
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]