| To: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [APPLETALK]: Use '%Z' for size_t. |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:09:14 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1077204436.18703.412.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200402190209.i1J29KF2020707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1077204436.18703.412.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:27:17 +0000 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 21:11 +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > > ChangeSet 1.1561.2.2, 2004/02/18 13:11:42-08:00, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > [APPLETALK]: Use '%Z' for size_t. > > %Zd is an ancient GNUism. Please use %zd in new code instead. As long as lib/vsprintf.c in the kernel supports it, there is no reason not to use it. They're never going to remove recognition of this thing from gcc printf's parsing. If it really bothers you, then go sick a kernel janitor onto it, because there are thousands of uses of %Z, I know because I put most of them into the tree :-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [NET] 64 bit byte counter for 2.6.3, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [NET 2.4] split arp_send into arp_create and arp_xmit, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [APPLETALK]: Use '%Z' for size_t., David Woodhouse |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [APPLETALK]: Use '%Z' for size_t., David Woodhouse |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |