| To: | Cheng Jin <chengjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: gigabit ethernet |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:31:54 -0800 |
| Cc: | satya srikanth <satyasrikanth2001@xxxxxxxxx>, "Xiaoliang (David) Wei" <weixl@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402131116590.24993-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402131116590.24993-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 |
Cheng Jin wrote: I read somewhere that Intel SMP has cpu0 taking care of all the hardware interrupts, but I don't know about softirqs.I think all softirqs related to the GbE are handled by the same cpu. For incoming network packets, the hw interrupt handler simply schedules a local softirq to handle the rest of the input processing. So the softirq will execute on the same CPU that the hw interrupt came in on. thanks, Nivedita |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] don't allow / in class device names, Greg KH |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: gigabit ethernet, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: gigabit ethernet, Cheng Jin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: gigabit ethernet, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |