Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [he] unconditionalize extra pci reads to flush posted

netdev

Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [he] unconditionalize extra pci reads to flush posted

To:	chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [he] unconditionalize extra pci reads to flush posted writes
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:04:24 -0800
Cc:	chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200402111429.i1BETlRr005845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<200402111429.i1BETlRr005845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:29:48 -0500
chas williams (contractor) <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> since its difficult to tell which pci bus is using
> posted writes, remove the ifdef's for the sgi sn2
> (and remove the extra flushes that would be flushed
> by other reads just slightly later).  the extra reads
> shouldnt impact performance.
> 
> please apply to 2.6 and 2.4

The readbacks should apply to many platforms anyways.
Applied, thanks Chas.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH][ATM]: [he] unconditionalize extra pci reads to flush posted writes, contractor Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [he] unconditionalize extra pci reads to flush posted writes, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] IPV6: kill in6_u.u6_addrX, David Stevens
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [clip] delay /proc/net/atm/arp creation, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH][ATM]: [he] unconditionalize extra pci reads to flush posted writes, contractor
Next by Thread:	[PATCH][ATM]: [clip] delay /proc/net/atm/arp creation, contractor
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]