| To: | Miguel Freitas <miguel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [patch] fix slot clash in sch_sfq.c] |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:35:31 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1076532461.19204.50.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1076532461.19204.50.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:47:41 -0200 Miguel Freitas <miguel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I better send a copy of this one to the mailing list... Your patch is correct. It is amusing that sfq_drop() was handling this correctly yet sfq_dequeue() was not. In fact, this breaks pretty seriously the behavior of this scheduler as you've noted. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fragmentation Attack, Gandalf The White |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [Fwd: [patch] fix slot clash in sch_sfq.c], Miguel Freitas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |