In article <20040210105124.61431b9b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 10 Feb 2004
10:51:24 -0800), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:44:48 -0800
> Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I strongly object. Strongly and strenuously. DaveM, please,
> > please, please, leave those golden lines alone. The original
> > from Alexey is a work of art, humor, character and intelligence.
>
> I totally agree. In documentation and things for end users, fine.
> We can typo correct till the end of time. But for comments meant
> for programmers, let's keep it lively and humorous and sometimes
> flat out grammatically wrong. This is what gives it flavor makes
> it our's.
Okay.
But... Please apply the following patch.
I want to fix my error and mis-leading flags. :-P
Thanks.
===== net/ipv6/addrconf.c 1.91 vs edited =====
--- 1.91/net/ipv6/addrconf.c Tue Feb 3 03:31:58 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv6/addrconf.c Wed Feb 11 03:56:59 2004
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@
eui[0] ^= 2;
return 0;
case ARPHRD_ARCNET:
- /* XXX: inherit EUI-64 fro mother interface -- yoshfuji */
+ /* XXX: inherit EUI-64 from other interface -- yoshfuji */
if (dev->addr_len != ARCNET_ALEN)
return -1;
memset(eui, 0, 7);
===== net/ipv6/ndisc.c 1.71 vs edited =====
--- 1.71/net/ipv6/ndisc.c Tue Feb 10 04:13:09 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv6/ndisc.c Wed Feb 11 04:00:28 2004
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@
return;
}
- /* XXX: RFC2461 7.1.1:
+ /* RFC2461 7.1.1:
* If the IP source address is the unspecified address,
* there MUST NOT be source link-layer address option
* in the message.
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@
return;
}
- /* XXX: RFC2461 8.1:
+ /* RFC2461 8.1:
* The IP source address of the Redirect MUST be the same as the
current
* first-hop router for the specified ICMP Destination Address.
*/
--yoshfuji
|