netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on forrpciod

To: trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on forrpciod
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:00:36 -0800
Cc: okir@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <35059.80.213.3.64.1076359739.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040207144405.GA19416@xxxxxx> <20040209102801.GC21364@xxxxxxx> <35059.80.213.3.64.1076359739.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:48:59 +0100 (CET)
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I'll admit that the rpciod killer code is racy, but I'm not sure that
> completions are the best answer, as they have at least one nasty feature:
> they are not interruptible.

Would you like to back out the change then?  I put it into
Linus's tree already.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>