| To: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours |
| From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:30:56 +0200 (EET) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402090806040.11837-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello,
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Pekka Savola wrote:
> As this seems to make the proxy_arp more intelligent, maybe you should
> take a look at:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thaler-ipv6-ndproxy-01.txt
>
> (which, at the moment, specifies proxy arp/ND for both IPv4 and IPv6)
>
> and see how close our implementation is wrt. to that spec, whether the
> above spec is better or worse, or whether there may be room for
> improvement otherwise as well?
Thanks, I'll check it later today.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on for rpciod, Olaf Kirch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.6.2 crash after network link failure, Petr Vandrovec |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |