| To: | Leonid Grossman <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Submission for S2io 10GbE driver |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Jan 2004 01:08:32 -0500 |
| Cc: | "'Stephen Hemminger'" <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "'Andi Kleen'" <ak@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <001801c3e497$010671a0$0400a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <001801c3e497$010671a0$0400a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 |
Leonid Grossman wrote: The loopback test is there as a part of the ethtool's diagnostic option. There are pros and cons of having the test in there I guess, anyone else has an opinion on this? Do other net drivers normally support loopback and other diag tests as a part of the ethtool support, or they provide little/no support for the option and ship a standalone diag program instead? The ethtool diag stuff is more of a quick sanity test than anything exhaustive. I definitely want to discourage tons of test code in drivers, as its code that users will almost-never run, it bloats the driver, and can be done with a special diag-only driver or diag program (or a combination of both). A lot of the 10/100 drivers originated from Donald Becker, who typically creates a userland (i.e. separate) diag program for each driver he writes.
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] pci_get_slot(), Greg KH |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Patch: IPv6/AMD64: bug in net/ipv6/ndisc.c, Jan Kasprzak |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Submission for S2io 10GbE driver, Leonid Grossman |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Submission for S2io 10GbE driver, Leonid Grossman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |