| To: | "'Jeff Garzik'" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Submission for S2io 10GbE driver |
| From: | "Leonid Grossman" <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:19:47 -0800 |
| Cc: | "'Stephen Hemminger'" <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "'Andi Kleen'" <ak@xxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <40160060.4010709@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > The ethtool diag stuff is more of a quick sanity test than anything > exhaustive. > > I definitely want to discourage tons of test code in drivers, as its > code that users will almost-never run, it bloats the driver, > and can be > done with a special diag-only driver or diag program (or a > combination > of both). > > A lot of the 10/100 drivers originated from Donald Becker, > who typically > creates a userland (i.e. separate) diag program for each > driver he writes. I see the point; we'll go ahead and get rid of the loopback. We actually have pretty extensive standalone diag tool that is based on diag driver. Thanks, Leonid > > Jeff > > > |
| Previous by Date: | RE: Submission for S2io 10GbE driver, Leonid Grossman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: r8169, 2.6.2-rc2, Sager 4780 laptop, bhartin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Submission for S2io 10GbE driver, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FW: Submission for S2io 10GbE driver, Francois Romieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |