| To: | Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [2.4] forcedeth network driver |
| From: | Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2004@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jan 2004 23:33:27 +0100 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20040124220545.GA3246@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <4012BF44.9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4012D3C6.1050805@xxxxxxxxx> <20040124220545.GA3246@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030821 |
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 03:21:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>>>>+static int alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev)
>>>>>+{
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>>>+ return 0;
>>>>>+}
>>>>
>>>>skb_reserve() seems to be missing
>>>>
>>>
>>>Do you have specs that show that all nForce versions support unaligned
>>>buffers? skb_reserve is a performance feature, I don't want to add it
>>>yet. Testing that it works is on our TODO list.
>>
>>hmmmm, is nForce ever found on non-x86 boxes? I would think that
>>skb_reserve might be -required- for some platforms.
>
>
> AMD64 and PPC64 as far as I know. But you may consider the first one
> still a x86 box.
Hmmm. I thought only GeForce graphics were available on PPC64 and nForce
mainboard chipsets (including the onboard nic) were not.
Carl-Daniel
--
http://www.hailfinger.org/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Compile Error with r8169.c, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [2.4] forcedeth network driver, Vojtech Pavlik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [2.4] forcedeth network driver, Vojtech Pavlik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [2.4] forcedeth network driver, Vojtech Pavlik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |