netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [2.6] nfs_rename: target $file busy, d_count=2

To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [2.6] nfs_rename: target $file busy, d_count=2
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:45:55 -0800
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040116005457.GE1784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20040116000346.GD1784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040116005457.GE1784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:54:57PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:03:46PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > Both client and server are running the same 2.6.1-bk2 kernel with TCP-NFS.
> > SMP, Highmem, & preempt.
> 
> I have four clients that are all having this problem also, three 2.6, and
> one 2.4 client.
> 
> Using TCP-NFS they all have stale nfs handles even after a reboot (only
> rebooted one to try with 2.4.23), but changed one to UDP-NFS, and it didn't
> have the stale handles.
> 
> Will do more testing with UDP-NFS.

No, TCP and UDP NFS both get stale file handles. :(

Can anyone reproduce?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>