| To: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.6] nfs_rename: target $file busy, d_count=2 |
| From: | Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:45:55 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040116005457.GE1784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20040116000346.GD1784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040116005457.GE1784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:54:57PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:03:46PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > Both client and server are running the same 2.6.1-bk2 kernel with TCP-NFS. > > SMP, Highmem, & preempt. > > I have four clients that are all having this problem also, three 2.6, and > one 2.4 client. > > Using TCP-NFS they all have stale nfs handles even after a reboot (only > rebooted one to try with 2.4.23), but changed one to UDP-NFS, and it didn't > have the stale handles. > > Will do more testing with UDP-NFS. No, TCP and UDP NFS both get stale file handles. :( Can anyone reproduce? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: better behavior for sendmsg/recvmsg during async closes, contractor |
| Previous by Thread: | Fwd: Re: [2.6] nfs_rename: target $file busy, d_count=2, Mike Fedyk |
| Next by Thread: | Fwd: Re: [2.6] nfs_rename: target $file busy, d_count=2, Mike Fedyk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |