|
OK, I agree with both of you. Then this patch is not needed. Yoshifuji, you can sleep in peace. ;-)
Thank you all!
Shirley Ma
IBM Linux Technology Center
15300 SW Koll Parkway
Beaverton, OR 97006-6063
Phone: (503) 578-7638
FAX: (503) 578-3228
Sent by: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx
cc: Shirley Ma/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS, mashirle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable
In article <20040115113840.4b7eb5d8.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:38:40 -0800), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> We can create new files to present information in new ways and formats,
> but I totally prefer using netlink based information gathering over making
> new procfs files.
Although this discussion is about rtnetlink message,
problem will be solved if we provide jiffies for neigbours
IMHO.
--yoshfuji @ let me sleep...
|