netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable

To: xma@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:45:22 +0900 (JST)
Cc: mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <OF6C177E72.62FA8BF9-ON87256E1C.006A8953@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <OF6C177E72.62FA8BF9-ON87256E1C.006A8953@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <OF6C177E72.62FA8BF9-ON87256E1C.006A8953@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 15 Jan 
2004 11:30:25 -0800), Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> This rule would mean that any new kernel development *could* break
> something somewhere else? ;-)

Please try to avoid changing the interface as long as you can.
Please add something rather change it.

In these case, we can avoid changing the interface,
so let's avoid breaking interface.

For ipv6inetNetToMeiaTable case, it is ok to add "jiffies," 
but it wrong to change the value's context.
If you really want to "change" that, please change the name.

Thanks.

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>