netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] support for large number of network devices.

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] support for large number of network devices.
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:52:52 -0800
Cc: mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040115004631.2839c8b8.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Open Source Development Lab
References: <20040113154610.38f5934c.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20040113155921.342db463.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040113161303.20f1159d.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20040114071303.GG28521@xxxxxxxxx> <20040114113734.4e9a0865.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20040114121155.7dabd70e.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040114162411.08322247.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20040115004631.2839c8b8.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:46:31 -0800
"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:24:11 -0800
> Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This should make it match the existing semantics more exactly.
> > It will skip the false positive matchs from sscanf trailing chars
> > or blanks.
> 
> Ok, but... I thought we had decided to move towards the hashing based
> patch you said you had so we can kill two birds with one stone?
> 
> At least, that is the conclusion I thought we had arrived at.
> :-)

The right way is a combination of the two pass dev_alloc_name and hashing
the names.  Both work together

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>