| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.0: something is leaking memory |
| From: | Erik Hensema <erik@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:14:42 +0100 |
| Cc: | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040104204834.40b6ca51.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <slrnbvgohn.1pb.erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401041257290.2162@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <slrnbvh1hd.jl6.erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401041826400.2162@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040104204834.40b6ca51.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | erik@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 08:48:34PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:30:21 -0800 (PST)
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > You've got 19 _megabytes_ allocated to "tcp6_sock", and they are all
> > marked as "active". That's almost certainly the leaking bug.
> >
> > Everything else looks reasonably normal.
> ...
> > David?
>
> Fixed by changeset 1.1496.16.1 which is in 2.6.1-rc1
Are you sure?
tcp6_sock 1110 1136 1024 4 1 : tunables 54 27 0
: slabdata 284 284 0
dexter:~ # netstat --inet6 | wc -l
21
dexter:~ # uptime
19:13:22 up 4:36, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.08, 0.09
This is 2.6.1-rc1.
I can't say anything definitive until after a few days of uptime, but it
sure seems the leak is still there.
--
Erik Hensema (erik@xxxxxxxxxxx)
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Deadlock in sungem/ip_auto_config/linkwatch, Stefan Rompf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Deadlock in sungem/ip_auto_config/linkwatch, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.0: something is leaking memory, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.0: something is leaking memory, Erik Hensema |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |