| To: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP) |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:55:27 +0100 |
| Cc: | ruddk@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, chester.f.johnson@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3FD7826F.1050308@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312101020480.21684-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031210203433.3747b7fd.ak@xxxxxxx> <3FD7826F.1050308@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:30:39 -0800 Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't think the network users will be very happy if you require changing > > all > > end hosts this way. How about the following hack? For DF=1 packets > > the ipid field is useless. When you rewrite the TOS to DSCP save > > the old TOS in the ipid field. When you see an ICMP fragment required > > message with the right DSCP on the router restore the old TOS from the ipid > > field. > > Wouldnt this require changes at the both ends, router and > host? How would we sync? Only the router would need to change (and rewrite ICMP messages, which is a bit nasty, but then compatibility is not always fun) -Andi P.S.: I am not opposed to fixing linux for this, just I have my doubts that fixing all end hosts is a practical solution for the problem. |
| Previous by Date: | RE: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP), Johnson, Chester F |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP), Nivedita Singhvi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP), Nivedita Singhvi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP), Nivedita Singhvi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |