| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP) |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:30:39 -0800 |
| Cc: | "Kevin W. Rudd" <ruddk@xxxxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, chester.f.johnson@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031210203433.3747b7fd.ak@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312101020480.21684-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031210203433.3747b7fd.ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 |
Andi Kleen wrote: I don't think the network users will be very happy if you require changing all end hosts this way. How about the following hack? For DF=1 packets the ipid field is useless. When you rewrite the TOS to DSCP save the old TOS in the ipid field. When you see an ICMP fragment requiredmessage with the right DSCP on the router restore the old TOS from the ipid field. Wouldnt this require changes at the both ends, router and host? How would we sync? thanks, Nivedita |
| Previous by Date: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP), Kevin W. Rudd |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP), Nivedita Singhvi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP), Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP), Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |