netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

RE: Problems with e1000 in 2.4.23

from [Feldman, Scott] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Ben Greear" <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Problems with e1000 in 2.4.23
From: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:06:16 -0800
Cc: <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcO3tgocNjgR3NUHT7u9liZ1t4t5ggACUBTAAAAyT+A=
Thread-topic: Problems with e1000 in 2.4.23 
> Could the problem happen because I do the set-multi even if
> the NIC is down?  Is there enough locking in the 
> e1000_ethtool additions?

Change ETHTOOL_SETRXALL to work more like ETHTOOL_SRXCSUM, with the
check for netif_running and down/up or reset.

-scott
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH][2.6] e100_phy.c uses free'd .text after init, Jeff Garzik
Next by Date:  Re: Problems with e1000 in 2.4.23, Ben Greear
Previous by Thread:  Re: Problems with e1000 in 2.4.23, Ben Greear
Next by Thread:  Re: Problems with e1000 in 2.4.23, Ben Greear
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]