| To: | "dada1" <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Performance problem with route cache ? |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:37:49 +0100 |
| Cc: | <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <02da01c3af54$c1f37f20$890010ac@edumazet> |
| References: | <02da01c3af54$c1f37f20$890010ac@edumazet> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
dada1 writes:
> Hi all
>
> I'm doing some oprofile on a bi athlon, linux-2.6.0-test8 kernel, (with a
> copybreak intel e1000 patch, because the machine receives a lot of small (<
> 30 bytes) messages)
Does the copybreak help? I tested copybreak long time ago and saw no gain
from it. Do you have pointer to the patch?
> It seems the route cache may/should be tuned, but I dont know how.
Tuning is not an easy task and not necessarily you will gain anything,
It fully depends on your input traffic but it seems your system has a
lot of dst entries. Which would cause a lot linear search. Packets per
flow and no of parallel flows should be of interest for you. rtstat can
give you a better feeling of incoming routing load.
Is 10kpkts/s the max performance?
Cheers.
--ro
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Performance problem with route cache ?, dada1 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | hw tcp v4 csum failed on 2.4.23-rc2, Felix Radensky |
| Previous by Thread: | Performance problem with route cache ?, dada1 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Performance problem with route cache ?, dada1 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |