| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Kernel crash in 2.6.0-test9-mm3 |
| From: | Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linux@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:30:31 +1300 |
| Cc: | kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031119190258.4d926957.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <OF0696EDA9.D66EB77E-ON88256DE3.0009C15A@xxxxxxxxxx> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119155347.023f89d0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031119185157.3edf69c8.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120160110.02412b80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031119190258.4d926957.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Ok I'll take this up with jakub@redhat, the gcc package maintainer at Redhat.What is interesting (or scary) is that the version of gcc that I'm using (3.3.2-2) is only one rebuild out from the one shipped in Fedora Core 1 (3.3.2-1), so I may not be the last person to hit this problem.. Reuben At 04:02 p.m. 20/11/2003, David S. Miller wrote: On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:05:27 +1300 Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linux@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes - with the patch backed out, the system has been up for 20 hours > without a crash and nothing has been logged. I was just holding off a bit > longer before reporting back in case it just needs a bit more time to > trigger ;-) Thanks a lot for this feedback. I really think gcc-3.x you're using is miscompiling some parts of the kernel with the patch applied. Someone should look at the x86 output assembler for things like the atomic_dec_and_test() call in net/core/skbuff.c:kfree_skbmem() |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] 8139too NAPI for net-drivers-2.5-exp, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Function to determine if IP exists on a net-device?, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kernel crash in 2.6.0-test9-mm3, Reuben Farrelly |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Kernel crash in 2.6.0-test9-mm3, Feldman, Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |