Re: [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa

netdev

Re: [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up

To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up
From:	James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:56:04 -0500 (EST)
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20031115212034.GA16326@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

> Does anybody see any problem with this simplification? Not for 2.6.0, of
> course...

No, looks like a good idea.  Might be able to push address length 
verification up there too.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Re: [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up, James Morris <= Re: [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Re: [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up, David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	Re: af_packet & CHECKSUM_HW, James Morris
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] ibmtr -- convert to new probeing, Jeff Garzik
Previous by Thread:	[RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Next by Thread:	Re: [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]