netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem

from [Jeff Garzik] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: johnip@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:32:00 -0500
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, ak@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jes@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3FB153F1.8040708@xxxxxxx>
References: <3F844578.40306@xxxxxxx> <20031008101046.376abc3b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3F8455BE.8080300@xxxxxxx> <20031008183742.GA24822@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031008122223.1ba5ac79.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031008202248.GA15611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3F8702FF.70500@xxxxxxx> <20031010192036.GA31727@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3F8802E6.5030601@xxxxxxx> <20031011131921.GC21763@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031011105054.0e16a607.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3F8C290A.3010508@xxxxxxx> <20031014095323.71c8b9fe.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3FB03A56.7000709@xxxxxxx> <20031110182911.2c5a121b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3FB140E2.1070007@xxxxxxx> <20031111122403.2d7bcf28.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3FB153F1.8040708@xxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 
John Partridge wrote:

David S. Miller wrote:


On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:04:50 -0600
Why are you depending upon MCKINLEY?  Don't all ia64 cpus
give traps for unaligned memory accesses?



I have no evidence of a problem with Itanium1, only on Itanium2 (MCKINLEY)
I have seen it on HP and SGI MCKINLEY



Ask the other David M about eepro100.c patches he wanted to send to me...

        Jeff
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Fw: issues with SO_PRIORITY and IP_TOS, kuznet
Next by Date:  forcedeth, Richard
Previous by Thread:  Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, John Partridge
Next by Thread:  Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, John Partridge
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]