| To: | tommy.christensen@xxxxxxxxx (Tommy Christensen) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux 2.6.0-test9 |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:25:15 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | torvalds@xxxxxxxx (Linus Torvalds), akpm@xxxxxxxx, Andries.Brouwer@xxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kernel Mailing List), netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller) |
| In-reply-to: | <3F9DBB7F.7030309@xxxxxxxxx> from "Tommy Christensen" at Oct 28, 2003 01:42:39 AM |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > I think the patch breaks things because it consumes (or rather skips) > the urgent data ( in the code after the label found_ok_skb: ). > > Since this happens before the SIGURG handler is run, it won't find > any urgent data. > > What do you think? Yes, you are absolutely right. I missed exactly this thing. > The patch by Linus seems to be fine though. I think the patch suggested by Linus is 100% correct and in fact it is the only solution. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: status of ipchains in 2.6?, Martin Josefsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.6.0-test-9] natsemi oops, Manfred Spraul |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux 2.6.0-test9, Tommy Christensen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux 2.6.0-test9, Andries . Brouwer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |