| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: status of ipchains in 2.6? |
| From: | David Mosberger <davidm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:56:58 -0800 |
| Cc: | davidm@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031028015032.734caf21.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200310280127.h9S1RM5d002140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031028015032.734caf21.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | davidm@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>>>>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 01:50:32 -0800, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> said: DaveM> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 17:27:22 -0800 David Mosberger DaveM> <davidm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I recently discovered that ipchains is rather broken. I noticed >> the problem on ia64, but suspect that it's likely to affect all >> 64-bit platforms (if not 32-bit platforms). A more detailed >> description of the problem I'm seeing is here: >> http://tinyurl.com/sm9d >> Unlike ipchains, iptables works perfectly fine, so perhaps we >> just need to update Kconfig to discourage ipchains on ia64 >> (and/or other 64-bit platforms)? DaveM> Might want to post this to the netfilter lists or netdev.... DaveM> Nah, that might actually get the bug fixed. $ fgrep -i ipchain MAINTAINERS $ Might want to consider updating the MAINTAINERS file? --david |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] remove historic entries in Documentation/Changes, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: status of ipchains in 2.6?, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: status of ipchains in 2.6?, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: status of ipchains in 2.6?, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |