| To: | Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH?] Fix sniffing of ARP replies |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2003 23:55:29 -0700 |
| Cc: | joe@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031016234847.GA17048@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <32A9D366A0B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031016152136.50e2a389.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1066344060.2232.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031016154537.2bcf7404.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031016234847.GA17048@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 01:48:47 +0200 Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It looked to me like that it is not intentional that ARP replies are not > delivered to the sniffer - from your reply it looks to me like that > only allowed user of whole packet_type, not only af_packet_priv member, > is AF_PACKET, and that for correct functionality af_packet_priv member > must be non-NULL. I relooked at this, and you may have a point. Let me study this some more. Thanks. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH?] Fix sniffing of ARP replies, Petr Vandrovec |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH?] Fix sniffing of ARP replies, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH?] Fix sniffing of ARP replies, Petr Vandrovec |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] init_netdev missing locking, Randy.Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |