| To: | Elmer <elmer@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) |
| From: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:49:29 -0700 |
| Cc: | noah@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310131328400.21697-100000@server> |
| Organization: | OSDL |
| References: | <20031012201316.7ecf73c8.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310131328400.21697-100000@server> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:31:30 +0200 (EET) Elmer <elmer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: | | | arlan.c is ok without arlan-proc.c | as init_arlan_proc is in arlan-proc.c, it shoult be | OK, as long as radio parameters are saved into cards ROM. | | I have forgot a lot about that code, of course. Hi Elmer, Sure, I understand the last comment. I don't quite understand the first paragraph though. Could we try again? Currently arlan.c + arlan-proc.c does not build if CONFIG_PROC_FS=n. The Makefile always builds arlan-main.o and arlan-proc.o. Are you saying that this is incorrect? Should arlan-proc.o only be built/used when CONFIG_PROC_FS=y? Thanks. -- ~Randy |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] nfmark modify extension to classifiers, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [2.6 PATCH] Fix IPVS sync state check, Wensong Zhang |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), Elmer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), Noah J. Misch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |