netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7)

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7)
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031011120852.13fa8ec4.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20031010141646.779f10bb.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> <20031011120852.13fa8ec4.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:08:52PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:16:46 -0700
> "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/atmprocfs_260t7.patch
> 
> How can this be needed?  When procfs is disabled then
> remove_proc_entry() is defined as "do { } while (0)", ie. a nop.

Due to this - the real offender:

from: net/atm/clip.c:
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#endif

        Sam

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>