netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] New Patch: Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable

from [Shirley Ma] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New Patch: Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable
From: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:42:26 -0700
Cc: mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sensitivity: 



> Why are you using jiffies for timestamps?  I guess these values
are measured "since bootup" or something like that?

Yes. The timestamp is the value of sysUpTime at the time this entry was
created.

Thanks
Shirley Ma
IBM Linux Technology Center
15300 SW Koll Parkway
Beaverton, OR 97006-6063
Phone: (503) 578-7638
FAX:      (503) 578-3228
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [PATCH] New Patch: Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable, Shirley Ma <=
Previous by Date:  patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), Randy.Dunlap
Next by Date:  Re: Second 3c509 missing (2.5.71 thru 2.6.0-t7), Pete Clements
Previous by Thread:  patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7), Randy.Dunlap
Next by Thread:  2.6.0-test7-netx2, Stephen Hemminger
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]