Re: [2.6 PATCH] ipvs - avoid returning NF_DROP from the packet scheduler

netdev

Re: [2.6 PATCH] ipvs - avoid returning NF_DROP from the packet scheduler

To:	Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [2.6 PATCH] ipvs - avoid returning NF_DROP from the packet schedulers
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:48:33 -0700
Cc:	wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0310081101170.5889-200000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0310081101170.5889-200000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:09:20 +0300 (EEST)
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> wrote:

>       It seems my NF_DROP approach leads to new bugs. So, better
> free skb, return NF_STOLEN and add some comments. If someone
> wants to fix it in another way, go ahead.

Applied, thanks.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[2.6 PATCH] ipvs - avoid returning NF_DROP from the packet schedulers, Julian Anastasov Re: [2.6 PATCH] ipvs - avoid returning NF_DROP from the packet schedulers, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] dvb-net -- allocate network device structures, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [Bridge] RE: [VLAN] Re: [PATCH/RFC] Let {ip, arp}tables "see" bridged VLAN tagged{I,AR}P packets, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[2.6 PATCH] ipvs - avoid returning NF_DROP from the packet schedulers, Julian Anastasov
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] kfree_skb() bug in 2.4.22, Tobias DiPasquale
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]