| To: | "Robert Olsson" <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: e1000 close (NAPI) |
| From: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:58:05 -0700 |
| Cc: | "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcOMz2HPbQwJmg7UQ5+TPIbpCTOuWwAkn0oQ |
| Thread-topic: | e1000 close (NAPI) |
> - if(work_done < work_to_do) {
> + if(work_done < work_to_do || !netif_running(netdev)) {
> netif_rx_complete(netdev);
> e1000_irq_enable(adapter);
> }
Is e1000 unique in this regard, or do the other NAPI-enabled drivers
have the same issue?
-scott
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] spinlock badness in last dongle changes., Jean Tourrilhes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | window scaling, a . ranu |
| Previous by Thread: | e1000 close (NAPI), Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: e1000 close (NAPI), Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |