| To: | Casey Carter <ccarter@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Strange UDP binding behavior (SO_BINDTODEVICE) |
| From: | Kevin Dwyer <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Oct 2003 17:08:23 -0400 |
| Cc: | Casey Carter <Casey@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3F83276D.3070700@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20031005130154.5bd9d182.kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3F81F1CD.8050803@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031006210600.37da62c9.kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3F83276D.3070700@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 15:51:57 -0500 Casey Carter <ccarter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IMHO, the delivery should weigh sk_bound_dev_if much more strongly (7 > instead of 2), so that if-bound sockets are always favored over > non-if-bound. I would be happy to submit the (trivial) patch to do so > if the networking gurus agree? Any possibility of getting this behavior into 2.4 as well? Albeit, without the scoring since that's obviously a new concept introduced by 2.6. (Which I prefer; well done.) I confess that I don't know who to talk to about such a change. -- - kpd "If at first you don't succeed, redefine success." - Anonymous
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Strange UDP binding behavior (SO_BINDTODEVICE), Casey Carter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Strange UDP binding behavior (SO_BINDTODEVICE), Casey Carter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Strange UDP binding behavior (SO_BINDTODEVICE), Casey Carter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Strange UDP binding behavior (SO_BINDTODEVICE), Casey Carter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |